However, six of the soldiers were released whereas two were given minor sentences[footnoteRef:9]. For their punishment, they were given a choice between going to jail or being branded on their finger. The Boston Massacre The Boston Massacre took boston massacre essay in outside the Boston Customs House. They had little supplies, money, and connections to people in the New World. The Townsend Acts were meant to replace the Stamp Act, which was repealed in Crispus Attucks American Revolutionist Crispus Attucks was born in in Framingham, Massachusetts. There were five casualties from this war, boston massacre essay.
Popular Topics in Category
The Boston Massacre was an extremely important event in American History. Also, it a very controversial topic. To this day, no one can really give an accurate description of the events that transpired. The Boston Massacre was not a random event at boston massacre essay many actions led up to the massacre. Boston massacre essay a result of this…. March fifth. There is no uncertainty that this was one of the most dismaying shows of bloodshed in history ; but who is to fault for the abetment of this distressing event? I believe that it was the British…. Vocabulary: Consent- To give the permission of an act. England did not tax the colonists with their consent, nor did England provide a reason for the taxes.
Colonial Assemblies- The legislatures of the colonies. Most colonies each had a legislature. Examples include the Virginia House of Burgesses, and the Massachusetts General Court, boston massacre essay. Propaganda- Misinformation, or…. Hiller B. Zobel presents a different aspect of the known story of The Boston Massacre. In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match. Home Government United States Boston Massacre. Essays on Boston Massacre We found 4 free papers on Boston Massacre. Role of Boston Massacre in U. History American History Boston Massacre.
American Revolution Test Review American Revolution Boston Massacre. Boston Massacre Was a Mere Incident Boston Boston Massacre. Only certified experts. Hi, boston massacre essay, my name is Amy �� In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Get help with your paper. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible.
reflective essay examples nursing
Usually someone would have to obtain a warrant in order to search the house, but the writs allowed the house so be searched without a warrant and without even specifying what as being targeted in the inspection. The writs of assistance enraged the colonists more than any of the other acts. Before the laws would be enforced though, Townsend died. This event took place on March 2, three days before the Boston Massacre. Another event took place on March 5, , a couple of hours before the massacre. Quite a large fight broke out at Murray Barracks between the townspeople and the British soldiers.
No one was injured seriously, but it set the stage for the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre kook place on March 5, 1 late in the evening. A brawl started in King Street by a young man who worked in the barbershop. Apparently, a soldier got his hair cut earlier and refused to pay the boys boss. When the boy confronted the soldier, the soldier knocked him down. When the boy spotted the soldier, he called out to let the other people of Boston to let them know that the soldier had attacked him. People began to gather around the Custom House. Once the crowd became very large, people began to throw rocks, snow, and ice at the soldiers. There were eight soldiers, and Thomas Preston, their madding officer.
Someone, apparently Crisps Attacks, a half-black, half- Indian man, struck the gun of one of the soldiers. No one can really accurately tell what happened next, but apparently the soldier lifted his gun after it had been struck with the stick, by Attacks, and fired. After the first shot, the British soldiers fired five more shots. Five people were killed. After the shots were fired, the rioters fled the scene. Crisps Attacks is always considered a very important part Of the massacre. This is because he is believed to be the first death of the American Revolution.
Not in the actual war, but in the ongoing fight for freedom in the colonies. He really was not all that important though. Four other people besides Crisps were killed that evening in front of the Custom House. Preston and the soldiers were given different trial. John Adams and Josiah Quince defended Preston. The trial lasted six days. When the trial was over, he was acquitted. There is no transcript of what transpired during the trial, so one can only speculate as to what took place. It was never proven that Preston gave the order for his men to fire. Not many people believe that he did in fact give the order to fire. Preston held to his story that he did not give the order to fire. The eight soldiers were also defended by John Adams and Josiah Quince.
There were so many different stories from witnesses as to what happened; a clear picture of the events could never be constructed. Six of the soldiers were acquitted of all the charges. Two of the soldiers, Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Killjoy were convicted of manslaughter. For their punishment, they were given a choice between going to jail or being branded on their finger. Of course, they elected to take the branding and were set free. The soldiers returned to Great Britain, as did Thomas Preston. The light punishment that the soldiers received as a whole greatly upset the colonists. In their eyes, it was just another insult that they had to endure at the hands of England. One event was the Boston Tea Party which took place on December 6, A group of men dressed up asMohawk Indians boarded the three ships in the Boston Harbor.
The ships, owned by the East India Company were laden with tea. The disguised colonists proceeded to throw the entire tea cargo of the boats into the harbor. Boston Massacre Brutal Murder or Self-Defense? Boston Massacre is known as the cornerstone of Revolutionary war which resulted into a series of events causing changes in the world's map. On face value, it can be perceived as an incident in which the innocent citizens were murdered by the tyrant government but a careful analysis would reveal that basic reasons of the Boston Massacre are rooted in the years of tension and strain that existed between the British government and colonists.
Boston Massacre is a controversial event reflected differently in British and American history. It is evident after careful unbiased analysis that Boston Massacre was a result of self-defense by the British army troop instead of an unprovoked gunfire, in response to attacks by Bostonian colonists. In order to understand the Boston massacre, it is important that the events leading to this incident and aftermaths are critically evaluated. On the other hand, the series of actions that took place before the event would be an indicative factor in this regard. In historical events where one of the parties to the incident has to proven guilty, it is difficult yet important to separate myths from the facts.
Boston Massacre is an event which was followed by an aggressive campaign from the British government as well as the local citizens, both portraying extremely opposite stories. However, an unbiased analysis based only on the course of events would help in reaching a conclusion. Boston was the capital city of Massachusetts and it was an important port where the major trade took place. Due to its important location, the city was responsible for the economic development in the region. However, when the British parliament decided to levy taxes on the merchants in Boston in s, the overall response was nothing but resistance[footnoteRef:1]. This resistance on economic reforms was instigated by the placement of a huge mass of soldiers approximately in numbers which was comparatively unreasonably highly as the overall population of Boston was merely twenty thousand heads.
Furthermore, the heavy taxation on gross income was further worsened by the Townshend Act resulting into heavy import tariffs[footnoteRef:2]. The resultant was a complete boycott of the affected items by the colonists. In the meanwhile, attempts were made to negotiate with the then King George III and also with other colonial regions so that more strength can be gained[footnoteRef:3]. html] Attempts were made by Lord Hillsborough to deal with the activities of the Massachusetts House which further worsened the situation. Following the course of events taking place, Charles Paxton, Boston's chief customer officer called for additional troops as the colonists were getting stronger[footnoteRef:4].
The event itself began with a small argument between the private White who was appointed at the Custom House and an apprentice of a local wigmaker. The wigmaker accused of the Captain Lieutenant not to pay for the bill of the wig whereas the truth is the bill was paid a day before the event. The private White demanded young wigmaker to be more respectful which turned into a heated argument during which the wigmaker was hit in the head by a musket. With progression of the argument, the crowd became more aggressive and grew in number which forced the White to ask for assistance which was provided by Captain Thomas Preston[footnoteRef:5]. According to the eye witnesses, the private White was provided an assistance of six armed Whites[footnoteRef:6].
In the meanwhile, the crowd kept on provoking the troop to fire on them whereas Captain Thomas did mentioned that the bayonets were loaded but they are not intending to open a fire on the public and in reality he gave no such orders. In the meanwhile, a local inn maker tried to hit the soldiers and Captain with his club[footnoteRef:7]. When one of the private Whites was hit by a stick, he opened the fire on the public anticipating more attacks. The gun shot was followed by more shots by his fellows for which no orders were given. Few days later, two more casualties took place[footnoteRef:8]. The crowd gathered on that day and the next day demanded governor for the fair trials which were later on guaranteed by the governor. However, six of the soldiers were released whereas two were given minor sentences[footnoteRef:9].
The following events were full of propaganda and depiction where British government as well as the colonists tried to gain public approval. Resultant was American Revolutionary war five years later[footnoteRef]. Bostonians were highly frustrated because of the economic reforms introduced in the region which restricted their trade liberty and also reduced the earned capital. When the British governments introduced its troops into the region, casual harassments from general public to the soldiers and vice versa were considered as a norm[footnoteRef]. Where one can criticize the just nature of reforms introduced by British government, the Boston Massacre was not a planned display of power. Eight Propositions for Public History on the Freedom Trail," The Public Historian 25, no.
Appearance of the young wigmaker and demanding the amount which was already paid a day before, can be perceived as boisterous and an intentional attempt to instigate the public. The concerned Captain who was the leading authority ignored the insult which assures once all over again that there was no such intent of harassing the public or causing any physical harm to them. Furthermore, the supporters who gathered for the supported of wigmaker made the situation since till that time, the private White was all alone and had no assistance which endangered his life. As the number grew and he was being attacked by petty items, he was forced to ask for assistance from the nearby regiment.
Careful analysis would reveal that up till now, British government representatives had shown no interest or intent in causing any harm to the mob gathered.
No comments:
Post a Comment